Chiemgau Impact Hypothesis is Dead
Along with Martin and Robert Rundkvist Darga I have some time to reply to the article by Antiquity Rappenglück et al. written. This was rejected by a rather interesting explanation for the editors of Antiquity:
It had in fact been found for about the same time, some well-known geologist and lodged itself a response that addresses leveraged more to the regional geology. The editors then decided just for this variant. Also good! Presumably, the response is not able to appear before March, the scientific mills grind slowly ... just
In the meantime, but Martin Rundkvist our view in his blog titled: 'Chiemgau Impact Hypothesis is Dead ' published.
0 comments:
Post a Comment