In der März Ausgabe von ANTIQUITY sind jetzt die Erwiderung von Doppler et al (2011) und die Verteidigung darauf von Rappenglück et al. (2011) appeared. This is probably from ANTIQUITY view the preliminary conclusion of the debate over the theory of linking the Chiemgau impact event with the Phaeton myth.
Doppler et. al (2011) lead, among other things, the new dating of the LFG as evidence of a much earlier origin of Tüttensee. The reply Rappenglück et. al. (2011) with the famous declaration of the drilling site would be inappropriate. Accordingly
had flown over the debris after the impact that body mass at first and would have been deposited as of the current Voräufer Walls. Is new now is that then this ejected material is again slid into the crater and then the drill site wieder freigelegt hätte. Sehr seltsam...
Gerhard Doppler, Erwin Geiss, Ernst Kroemer & Robert Traid (2011): Response to ‘The fall of Phaethon: a Greco-Roman geomyth preserves the memory of a meteorite impact in Bavaria (south-east Germany)’ by Rappenglück et al. (Antiquity 84). ANTIQUITY 85 (2011): 274–277
Barbara Rappenglück, Michael A. Rappenglück, Kord Ernstson, Werner Mayer, Andreas Neumair, Dirk Sudhaus & Ioannis Liritzis (2011): Reply to Doppler et al. ‘Response to “The fall of Phaethon: a Greco-Roman geomyth preserves the memory of a meteorite impact in Bavaria (south-east Germany) (Antiquity 84)”’
Barbara Rappenglück1, *, Michael A. Rappenglück, cord Ernstson. ANTIQUITY 85 (2011): 278-280
0 comments:
Post a Comment